Consider this, a country in the
midst of a doctors strike is touted as a trailblazer towards universal healthcare
coverage. A country with a region of its nation with the highest maternal
mortality rate in the world, and with a non-responsive health administration is
viewed as a bastion of good healthcare governance towards universal healthcare.
The assertion by the UN regional coordinator Mr Siddharth Chatterjee in an article in HuffPost -Kenya can lead the way to universal health coverage in Africa is preposterous, absurd and myopic at best. I hereby seek to give a
rejoinder to the assertions he made.
First of all and on a cynical
note, I find the timing of the article to be in bad taste and with a motive
that I can’t quite put my finger on. It’s a great coincidence that his article
would seek to give a rosy picture while the health system is in shambles, decrepit
and on the precipice. With no mention of the current scenario on the ground.
Kenya is a country with millions of individuals unable to access healthcare services due to multiple factors and has not shown any leadership towards reversing the trend. In the post 2015 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) era, Good health and well-being is touted as a goal worth aspiring for and Universal health coverage as a path towards it. Not to criticize such a noble goal, I just have to say the goal is broad and does not have enjoiners such as sustainability and responsiveness to the will of the people of each nation. Thus it’s bound to be interpreted differently by different people with varying results.
With a healthcare budget quarter
of the Abuja declaration 15% goal, it’s ironic that Kenya can manage to do much
with that allocation. In fact if it ever did manage to achieve anything, it
would be the new gold standard with which all other health systems should
follow. I have on other occasions stated my views on the path towards Universal
health coverage and still argue that increase in the government share of Total
Healthcare Expenditure is a basic requirement.
Secondly the political will and
leadership has been lacking and needs to be made aware of the interrelationship
between health and economic development .So, unless the political leadership
gives tacit approval to a move to UHC, any efforts would be herculean. I saw
hope for greater lobbying for the cause of universal health coverage locally.
Despite devolution of healthcare service
delivery, challenges in access of care abound and the current standoff between
doctors and the government rolls back any gains attained unless it is addressed
with urgency, fairness and finality. The fluidity of human resources for health
will further increase through internal and external brain drains of the
stand-off and it’s only a matter of time before the health system collapses. So,
an international agency like the UN should have been in the forefront to
advocate for a rapid and amicable solution.
Financial barriers to access of
care has been a key factor in lack of better health indicators. But with the
increase in innovative financing schemes aimed at pooling of risk and addressing
the community needs have truly helped .The increase in NHIF membership to all
sectors of the population is a noble attempt to ensure fewer Kenyans suffer
from catastrophic healthcare expenditures through out of pocket payments. Expansion
of NHIF coverage without a review of the currently prevalent provider-determined fee-for-service payment system,
the cost of care will increase without a commensurate improvement of outcomes
since there is no incentive towards improving quality of care and reducing
costs. Moreover, the healthcare financing system needs to be evaluated to
determine whether a tax-funded single payer health system or a risk-pooling
health insurance exchange akin to the about to be repealed Affordable Care Act
in the United States would be beneficial to the people. According to me an
open-market health-insurance system is a trap that would not enhance access of
care to the people. Various studies have shown the importance of tax-funded
health systems and their impact towards increase in health and social
development indicators. So, I again call for a more conservative look at health
financing to ensure government commitment to the health of the people as
enshrined in the constitution before seeking external private equity for
investment.
As for the assertion by
Chatterjee that maternal mortality rates reduction in 2008-2014 was
attributable to government efforts to make primary and maternal services free, it’s
debatable. The government free maternity program started in 2013 and most
likely the reduction in the maternal mortality rates were due to factors prior
to the adoption the government directive. It is even worrying to see the impact
of the current industrial action by doctors and the periodic go-slows by all
health workers due to hitches in the devolution of healthcare services. As for
the Beyond Zero campaign, other than structural measures improvement such as
purchase of mobile vans there have not been many studies that have attributed the
gains in maternal health in any part of the country to the initiative. It is still in its infancy and is
most likely an intervention that needs to be studied in detail.
Kenya is a hub of technological
innovations and its true this can be used to further improve access of care
through telemedicine and remote diagnosis and consultations. However any
initiative geared towards this is bound to attract vulture capitalists with a
desire to benefit from the poor through introduction of closed-system
innovations that tie the government and other facilities to their software for
a skewed profit sharing. Imagine Uber and Netflix model for healthcare, where a
seed company in New York gets to harvest some amount for any procedure reported
through the system or consultation through the teleportal. An alternative to
this shylock economy is to empower local technology wizards to come up with
home-made solutions to the telemedicine dilemma. Currently,the Kenyan
healthcare scene has also attracted attention of New York attention, in the
hope that health information system for telemedicine falls into their hands. With
telemedicine and integrated health information systems, come Health Analytics. A
field that has the potential to give solutions to population health through
models and predictive algorithms that could shape decision making and further
reduction (or increase in care if it falls to the wrong hands.)
Finally if the international
organizations are truly looking out for the best for Kenya and Africa, they
should stop commodifying healthcare and pushing for private-based investments
through the Global Financing Facility and other umbrella ventures. Instead they
should work with the governments to come up with solutions that ensure
universal health coverage.
Keeping with the spirit of
philosophical endings, United Nations has the moral imperative to ensure none
of humanity are forced to endure further suffering through still-born initiatives.But if the status quo remains, Kenya
CAN NEVER be a beacon to achieving universal health coverage.
1 comment:
I agree with all the points you made. It is strange that the UN resident coordinator in Kenya can write an article on Kenya's progress towards UHC without even mentioning the doctor's strike, which began on 5th December. This is a huge public health crisis, and the UN coordinator does not even mention it!
Post a Comment